Unfortunately, no.Terence wrote:You are using the Souci Fachmann Kraut nutrition tables, right? Are they somewhere available online?
Any other database you know?
I didnt say that.RRM wrote:No, I didn´t know that the n6:n3-ratio discussion is so controversial.
did I?
I said "more" controversial.
Excuse me?I have the feeling that you think a lot about your n6:n3-ratio.
Im rtying to answer your questions...
When you are extremely physically active, you need way more sugars, as muscles requires sugars.RRM wrote:I didn´t know that your current diet is SO FAR away from Wai's sample diet
The fat:sugar ratio is a guideline because some people asked about it. NOT a rule.
Many have proven so.Do you think that is possible to maintain Wai's diet without juices
Its not about the context, but about what those studies show, strictly regarding energy intake.I don't know any study in the context of raw food.
Its not about overeating.it´s not possible to overeat day after day.
Terence wrote:Again, according to Cordain and others olive oil has a n6:n3-ratio of 13.1.
It doesnt list omega 6 fat specifically; the amount of 18:2 is undifferentiated; 8050 mg. Alpha-linolenic acid is 635. Other 18:3 are not listed. So, the ratio could maximally be 12.7:1, according to this info, but it could also be much lower.What does 'your' nutrient database say about the n6:n3-ratio in olive oil?
Sure its higher in sugars, but that doesnt make the omega balance better or worse.RRM, I think your diet is not representative for most Wai dieters.
Absolutely not.I think you have to agree that the n6:n3-ratio of this diet, according to reliable nutrient databases, is much higher than 4:1, correct?
It totally depends on what you eat.
Is this the same Terence stating that such data are unreliable and that we should not believe science but our bodies?Can this ratio be detrimental to health?
What ratio are you referring to?